Federal agency
Multiple SRAs delivered within a single review window
Scoped, assessed, and reported on three distinct SRAs within one assessment cycle, covering an integration platform, supplier uplift, and public-facing services.
ASD-aligned security assessment for cloud and on-premise systems serving Australian government. Delivered by our in-house IRAP capability — not outsourced.
IRAP Assessment
IRAP Capability
ON STAFF
ISM Controls
247
Assessed
Your cloud platform or system needs an IRAP assessment to serve Australian government clients, but the assessment process feels opaque and resource-intensive.
The Information Security Manual is large and detailed. You need an IRAP capability that understands the controls applicable to your system and can translate their effectiveness within that context — giving you better visibility of the risks that matter.
System boundaries, environments (admin, test, development), and shared-responsibility models can be unclear at the outset. You need an assessor who scopes accurately upfront so findings are practical and reflect how the system really operates.
Per the IRAP Consumer Guide, an IRAP assessment report includes the items below. Note that an IRAP assessment is not a risk assessment — risk treatment decisions sit with the system owner.
Description of the system and the environments in scope, including administrative, test, and development environments where applicable.
Assessment scope and the system boundary, including what is in and out of scope and why.
An overview of the system's strengths and weaknesses, drawn from assessment of applicable ISM controls.
The governance arrangements supporting the system, including roles, responsibilities, and authorisation pathways.
Detailed assessment findings, supporting information, and evidence collected during the assessment.
Prioritised remediation activities to address identified weaknesses.
The Security Assessment Report is supported by a Cloud Controls Matrix or Security Controls Matrix as an annex — recording assessor judgements against each applicable ISM control.
IRAP assessments are structured into four phases, in line with the ASD IRAP Consumer Guide.
Define scope, system boundary, and assessment objectives. Confirm environments in scope and applicable ISM controls.
Assess whether the system has been designed to implement applicable ISM controls effectively (formerly referred to as "Stage 1").
Assess whether implemented controls are operating effectively in practice (formerly referred to as "Stage 2"). Controls testing here is distinct from a vulnerability assessment.
Produce the Security Assessment Report and supporting controls matrix annex covering findings, evidence, governance, and recommended remediation.
You're building platforms that serve Australian government and need IRAP assessment to access that market.
You need independent IRAP assessment of internal systems or third-party services to meet ISM and PSPF obligations.
You're developing systems for Defence or national security clients that require assessed security postures.
Managed Service Providers should also consider undergoing IRAP assessment — particularly where shared services support Australian government clients with ISM obligations.
Federal agency
Scoped, assessed, and reported on three distinct SRAs within one assessment cycle, covering an integration platform, supplier uplift, and public-facing services.
Federal department
Delivered an Essential Eight maturity review across a multi-system environment using ACSC verification methodology. Followed with continuous assurance aligned to PSPF reporting and ASD survey cycles, maintaining visibility of control effectiveness between formal assessments.
Federal agency
Delivered executive and board-ready cyber governance papers, stood up a Foreign Ownership Control and Influence process, and supported system accreditation activities across a shared-services environment — so the agency walked into its next review with defensible answers.
Yes. Our IRAP capability is part of the Strategic Cyber team — not outsourced or subcontracted. This means faster engagement, tighter communication, and consistent quality throughout the assessment.
Timelines vary based on system complexity and classification level. A typical cloud-platform assessment runs 8–16 weeks including both the Design Effectiveness Review and Operational Effectiveness Review. We scope tightly upfront so the timeline is predictable and evidence expectations are clear from day one.
Essential Eight is a set of 8 mitigation strategies focused on cyber resilience. IRAP is a broader security assessment methodology covering the full ISM control set applicable to a specific system. Many systems need both.
Absolutely. We provide prioritised remediation guidance as part of the SAR, and can support implementation of identified fixes through our uplift and advisory services.
IRAP assessments are scoped and priced per system. We'll give you a firm range after a scoping conversation — pricing depends on system complexity, ISM controls in scope, and classification level.
IRAP is specifically for ISM-aligned evaluations of systems used by Australian government. Our IRAP capability is AGSVA-cleared and has delivered IRAPs for federal agencies — not general-purpose auditors who also offer IRAP on the side.